Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) vs Japan: GNI (current US$), per square kilometre

Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
355,107 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Japan
12.72 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) rank
23rd
Japan rank
25th

GNI (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
  • Japan
05.0M10.0M15.0M20.0M196119922023

How they compare

Japan currently reports 12.72 million current US$ per square kilometre against 355,107 current US$ per square kilometre in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income), a difference of 12.36 million current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Japan's figure about 35.8 times Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)'s.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.

Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 23rd and Japan ranks 25th of 45 groups.

Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) Japan Difference Ahead
1990s 138,184 current US$ per square kilometre 12.43 million current US$ per square kilometre 12.29 million current US$ per square kilometre Japan
2000s 128,675 current US$ per square kilometre 13.41 million current US$ per square kilometre 13.29 million current US$ per square kilometre Japan
2010s 258,520 current US$ per square kilometre 15.24 million current US$ per square kilometre 14.98 million current US$ per square kilometre Japan
2020s 292,504 current US$ per square kilometre 13.85 million current US$ per square kilometre 13.55 million current US$ per square kilometre Japan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gni (current us$), per square kilometre, Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) or Japan?
Japan, at 12.72 million current US$ per square kilometre against 355,107 current US$ per square kilometre in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) as of 2023.
What is the difference in gni (current us$), per square kilometre between Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and Japan?
12.36 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Japan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and Japan?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and Japan rank globally for gni (current us$), per square kilometre?
Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 23rd and Japan ranks 25th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GNI (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) vs Japan: GNI (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-current-us-per-square-kilometre/europe-and-central-asia-excluding-high-income/japan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-current-us-per-square-kilometre/europe-and-central-asia-excluding-high-income/japan/">Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) vs Japan: GNI (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GNI (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
254 places, 13,003 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

GNI (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.