Barbados vs Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income): GNI (current US$), per square kilometre

Barbados
16.16 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
355,107 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados rank
20th
Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) rank
23rd

GNI (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Barbados
  • Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
05.0M10.0M15.0M196119922023

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 16.16 million current US$ per square kilometre against 355,107 current US$ per square kilometre in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income), a difference of 15.80 million current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Barbados's figure about 45.5 times Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)'s.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Barbados has been ahead every year.

Barbados ranks 20th and Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 23rd of 206 countries.

Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) Difference Ahead
1990s 5.24 million current US$ per square kilometre 138,184 current US$ per square kilometre 5.10 million current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
2000s 8.42 million current US$ per square kilometre 128,675 current US$ per square kilometre 8.29 million current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
2010s 12.81 million current US$ per square kilometre 258,520 current US$ per square kilometre 12.55 million current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
2020s 14.45 million current US$ per square kilometre 292,504 current US$ per square kilometre 14.16 million current US$ per square kilometre Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gni (current us$), per square kilometre, Barbados or Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)?
Barbados, at 16.16 million current US$ per square kilometre against 355,107 current US$ per square kilometre in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) as of 2023.
What is the difference in gni (current us$), per square kilometre between Barbados and Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)?
15.80 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Barbados and Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) rank globally for gni (current us$), per square kilometre?
Barbados ranks 20th and Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 23rd of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GNI (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income): GNI (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-current-us-per-square-kilometre/barbados/europe-and-central-asia-excluding-high-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-current-us-per-square-kilometre/barbados/europe-and-central-asia-excluding-high-income/">Barbados vs Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income): GNI (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GNI (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
254 places, 13,003 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

GNI (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.