Sao Tome and Principe vs Uruguay: GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre

Sao Tome and Principe
17.94 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Uruguay
16.38 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe rank
92nd
Uruguay rank
93rd

GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Sao Tome and Principe
  • Uruguay
05.0M10.0M15.0M20.0M196119922023

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 17.94 million current LCU per square kilometre against 16.38 million current LCU per square kilometre in Uruguay, a difference of 1.56 million current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.1 times Uruguay's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Sao Tome and Principe ranks 92nd and Uruguay ranks 93rd of 206 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Sao Tome and Principe averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sao Tome and Principe Uruguay Difference Ahead
1970s 1,676 current LCU per square kilometre 76.18 current LCU per square kilometre 1,600 current LCU per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1980s 5,125 current LCU per square kilometre 6,554 current LCU per square kilometre 1,429 current LCU per square kilometre Uruguay
1990s 198,713 current LCU per square kilometre 718,190 current LCU per square kilometre 519,477 current LCU per square kilometre Uruguay
2000s 1.59 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.47 million current LCU per square kilometre 873,473 current LCU per square kilometre Uruguay
2010s 6.17 million current LCU per square kilometre 8.12 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.96 million current LCU per square kilometre Uruguay
2020s 13.96 million current LCU per square kilometre 14.34 million current LCU per square kilometre 383,375 current LCU per square kilometre Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gni (current lcu), per square kilometre, Sao Tome and Principe or Uruguay?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 17.94 million current LCU per square kilometre against 16.38 million current LCU per square kilometre in Uruguay as of 2023.
What is the difference in gni (current lcu), per square kilometre between Sao Tome and Principe and Uruguay?
1.56 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and Uruguay?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Sao Tome and Principe and Uruguay rank globally for gni (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 92nd and Uruguay ranks 93rd of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sao Tome and Principe vs Uruguay: GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/sao-tome-and-principe/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/sao-tome-and-principe/uruguay/">Sao Tome and Principe vs Uruguay: GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 10,468 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

GNI (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.