Mexico vs Sao Tome and Principe: GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre

Mexico
15.98 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
17.94 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Mexico rank
94th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
92nd

GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Mexico
  • Sao Tome and Principe
05.0M10.0M15.0M20.0M196119922023

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 17.94 million current LCU per square kilometre against 15.98 million current LCU per square kilometre in Mexico, a difference of 1.96 million current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.1 times Mexico's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Mexico ranks 94th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 92nd of 206 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Mexico averaged higher in 5 and Sao Tome and Principe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mexico Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1970s 642.68 current LCU per square kilometre 1,676 current LCU per square kilometre 1,033 current LCU per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1980s 67,276 current LCU per square kilometre 5,125 current LCU per square kilometre 62,151 current LCU per square kilometre Mexico
1990s 1.37 million current LCU per square kilometre 198,713 current LCU per square kilometre 1.17 million current LCU per square kilometre Mexico
2000s 5.00 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.59 million current LCU per square kilometre 3.41 million current LCU per square kilometre Mexico
2010s 9.68 million current LCU per square kilometre 6.17 million current LCU per square kilometre 3.51 million current LCU per square kilometre Mexico
2020s 14.05 million current LCU per square kilometre 13.96 million current LCU per square kilometre 92,350 current LCU per square kilometre Mexico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gni (current lcu), per square kilometre, Mexico or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 17.94 million current LCU per square kilometre against 15.98 million current LCU per square kilometre in Mexico as of 2023.
What is the difference in gni (current lcu), per square kilometre between Mexico and Sao Tome and Principe?
1.96 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Sao Tome and Principe?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Mexico and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for gni (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Mexico ranks 94th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 92nd of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mexico vs Sao Tome and Principe: GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/mexico/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/mexico/sao-tome-and-principe/">Mexico vs Sao Tome and Principe: GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 10,468 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

GNI (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.