Guinea-Bissau vs New Caledonia: GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre

Guinea-Bissau
45.05 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
New Caledonia
60.71 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Guinea-Bissau rank
64th
New Caledonia rank
61st

GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • New Caledonia
020.0M40.0M60.0M196119922023

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 60.71 million current LCU per square kilometre against 45.05 million current LCU per square kilometre in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 15.65 million current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes New Caledonia's figure about 1.3 times Guinea-Bissau's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, New Caledonia has been ahead every year.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 64th and New Caledonia ranks 61st of 206 countries.

New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1970s 5,828 current LCU per square kilometre 3.19 million current LCU per square kilometre 3.18 million current LCU per square kilometre New Caledonia
1980s 106,442 current LCU per square kilometre 8.03 million current LCU per square kilometre 7.92 million current LCU per square kilometre New Caledonia
1990s 6.64 million current LCU per square kilometre 16.94 million current LCU per square kilometre 10.30 million current LCU per square kilometre New Caledonia
2000s 11.90 million current LCU per square kilometre 33.90 million current LCU per square kilometre 22.00 million current LCU per square kilometre New Caledonia
2010s 23.95 million current LCU per square kilometre 53.44 million current LCU per square kilometre 29.49 million current LCU per square kilometre New Caledonia
2020s 39.95 million current LCU per square kilometre 59.07 million current LCU per square kilometre 19.11 million current LCU per square kilometre New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gni (current lcu), per square kilometre, Guinea-Bissau or New Caledonia?
New Caledonia, at 60.71 million current LCU per square kilometre against 45.05 million current LCU per square kilometre in Guinea-Bissau as of 2023.
What is the difference in gni (current lcu), per square kilometre between Guinea-Bissau and New Caledonia?
15.65 million current LCU per square kilometre, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and New Caledonia?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Guinea-Bissau and New Caledonia rank globally for gni (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 64th and New Caledonia ranks 61st of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs New Caledonia: GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/guinea-bissau/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/guinea-bissau/new-caledonia/">Guinea-Bissau vs New Caledonia: GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 10,468 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

GNI (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.