Costa Rica vs Singapore: GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre

Costa Rica
857.89 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Singapore
770.42 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
14th
Singapore rank
17th

GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Singapore
0200.0M400.0M600.0M800.0M196119922023

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 857.89 million current LCU per square kilometre against 770.42 million current LCU per square kilometre in Singapore, a difference of 87.47 million current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.1 times Singapore's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Singapore ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 14th and Singapore ranks 17th of 206 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and Singapore in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Singapore Difference Ahead
1960s 78,309 current LCU per square kilometre 5.09 million current LCU per square kilometre 5.01 million current LCU per square kilometre Singapore
1970s 330,250 current LCU per square kilometre 19.12 million current LCU per square kilometre 18.79 million current LCU per square kilometre Singapore
1980s 3.60 million current LCU per square kilometre 60.30 million current LCU per square kilometre 56.70 million current LCU per square kilometre Singapore
1990s 39.54 million current LCU per square kilometre 171.03 million current LCU per square kilometre 131.49 million current LCU per square kilometre Singapore
2000s 188.91 million current LCU per square kilometre 299.48 million current LCU per square kilometre 110.58 million current LCU per square kilometre Singapore
2010s 541.53 million current LCU per square kilometre 552.60 million current LCU per square kilometre 11.07 million current LCU per square kilometre Singapore
2020s 779.73 million current LCU per square kilometre 714.65 million current LCU per square kilometre 65.08 million current LCU per square kilometre Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gni (current lcu), per square kilometre, Costa Rica or Singapore?
Costa Rica, at 857.89 million current LCU per square kilometre against 770.42 million current LCU per square kilometre in Singapore as of 2023.
What is the difference in gni (current lcu), per square kilometre between Costa Rica and Singapore?
87.47 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Singapore?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and Singapore rank globally for gni (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Costa Rica ranks 14th and Singapore ranks 17th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Singapore: GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/singapore/">Costa Rica vs Singapore: GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 10,468 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

GNI (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.