Equatorial Guinea vs Tanzania, United Republic of: GNI (current LCU), per capita

Equatorial Guinea
3.49 million current LCU per person
in 2025
Tanzania, United Republic of
3.17 million current LCU per person
in 2025
Equatorial Guinea rank
27th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
30th

GNI (current LCU), per capita over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
02.0M4.0M6.0M196019922025

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 3.49 million current LCU per person against 3.17 million current LCU per person in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 313,430 current LCU per person.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Tanzania, United Republic of's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 27th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 30th of 208 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1960s 12,284 current LCU per person 2,498 current LCU per person 9,787 current LCU per person Equatorial Guinea
1970s 18,874 current LCU per person 2,317 current LCU per person 16,557 current LCU per person Equatorial Guinea
1980s 44,675 current LCU per person 14,484 current LCU per person 30,191 current LCU per person Equatorial Guinea
1990s 176,664 current LCU per person 142,872 current LCU per person 33,792 current LCU per person Equatorial Guinea
2000s 2.50 million current LCU per person 530,689 current LCU per person 1.97 million current LCU per person Equatorial Guinea
2010s 4.70 million current LCU per person 1.69 million current LCU per person 3.01 million current LCU per person Equatorial Guinea
2020s 3.56 million current LCU per person 2.75 million current LCU per person 805,622 current LCU per person Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gni (current lcu), per capita, Equatorial Guinea or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Equatorial Guinea, at 3.49 million current LCU per person against 3.17 million current LCU per person in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2025.
What is the difference in gni (current lcu), per capita between Equatorial Guinea and Tanzania, United Republic of?
313,430 current LCU per person, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Tanzania, United Republic of?
62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2025.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for gni (current lcu), per capita?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 27th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 30th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GNI (current LCU), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Tanzania, United Republic of: GNI (current LCU), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-current-lcu-per-capita/equatorial-guinea/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-current-lcu-per-capita/equatorial-guinea/tanzania/">Equatorial Guinea vs Tanzania, United Republic of: GNI (current LCU), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GNI (current LCU), per capita
Unit
current LCU per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
209 places, 11,276 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

GNI (current LCU) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.