Ecuador vs Kosovo: GNI (current LCU), per capita
Ecuador
6,928 current LCU per person
in 2025
Kosovo
7,132 current LCU per person
in 2025
Ecuador rank
199th
Kosovo rank
198th
GNI (current LCU), per capita over time
- Ecuador
- Kosovo
How they compare
Kosovo currently reports 7,132 current LCU per person against 6,928 current LCU per person in Ecuador, a difference of 204 current LCU per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 199th and Kosovo ranks 198th of 208 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Kosovo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4,033 current LCU per person | 2,051 current LCU per person | 1,982 current LCU per person | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 5,734 current LCU per person | 3,158 current LCU per person | 2,576 current LCU per person | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 6,298 current LCU per person | 5,527 current LCU per person | 771 current LCU per person | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gni (current lcu), per capita, Ecuador or Kosovo?
- Kosovo, at 7,132 current LCU per person against 6,928 current LCU per person in Ecuador as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gni (current lcu), per capita between Ecuador and Kosovo?
- 204 current LCU per person, with Kosovo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Kosovo?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2025.
- How do Ecuador and Kosovo rank globally for gni (current lcu), per capita?
- Ecuador ranks 199th and Kosovo ranks 198th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as GNI (current LCU), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
GNI (current LCU) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.