Cuba vs Eritrea: GNI (current LCU), per capita
Cuba
9,094 current LCU per person
in 2019
Eritrea
10,468 current LCU per person
in 2011
Cuba rank
196th
Eritrea rank
194th
GNI (current LCU), per capita over time
- Cuba
- Eritrea
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 10,468 current LCU per person against 9,094 current LCU per person in Cuba, a difference of 1,374 current LCU per person.
That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.2 times Cuba's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 196th and Eritrea ranks 194th of 208 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 1 and Eritrea in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Eritrea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2,041 current LCU per person | 1,940 current LCU per person | 100.98 current LCU per person | Cuba |
| 2000s | 3,904 current LCU per person | 5,925 current LCU per person | 2,021 current LCU per person | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 5,789 current LCU per person | 9,332 current LCU per person | 3,543 current LCU per person | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gni (current lcu), per capita, Cuba or Eritrea?
- Eritrea, at 10,468 current LCU per person against 9,094 current LCU per person in Cuba as of 2011.
- What is the difference in gni (current lcu), per capita between Cuba and Eritrea?
- 1,374 current LCU per person, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Eritrea?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2011.
- How do Cuba and Eritrea rank globally for gni (current lcu), per capita?
- Cuba ranks 196th and Eritrea ranks 194th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as GNI (current LCU), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
GNI (current LCU) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.