Malawi vs Mauritius: GNI (constant LCU), per capita
Malawi
338,280 constant LCU per person
in 2025
Mauritius
423,202 constant LCU per person
in 2025
Malawi rank
56th
Mauritius rank
54th
GNI (constant LCU), per capita over time
- Malawi
- Mauritius
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 423,202 constant LCU per person against 338,280 constant LCU per person in Malawi, a difference of 84,922 constant LCU per person.
That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.3 times Malawi's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.
Malawi ranks 56th and Mauritius ranks 54th of 170 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 349,935 constant LCU per person | 423,860 constant LCU per person | 73,925 constant LCU per person | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 343,373 constant LCU per person | 384,038 constant LCU per person | 40,665 constant LCU per person | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gni (constant lcu), per capita, Malawi or Mauritius?
- Mauritius, at 423,202 constant LCU per person against 338,280 constant LCU per person in Malawi as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gni (constant lcu), per capita between Malawi and Mauritius?
- 84,922 constant LCU per person, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Mauritius?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2025.
- How do Malawi and Mauritius rank globally for gni (constant lcu), per capita?
- Malawi ranks 56th and Mauritius ranks 54th of 170 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as GNI (constant LCU), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
GNI (constant LCU) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.