Finland vs San Marino: GNI (constant LCU), per capita
Finland
43,085 constant LCU per person
in 2025
San Marino
38,174 constant LCU per person
in 2023
Finland rank
102nd
San Marino rank
105th
GNI (constant LCU), per capita over time
- Finland
- San Marino
How they compare
Finland currently reports 43,085 constant LCU per person against 38,174 constant LCU per person in San Marino, a difference of 4,911 constant LCU per person.
That makes Finland's figure about 1.1 times San Marino's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.
Finland ranks 102nd and San Marino ranks 105th of 170 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | San Marino | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 43,311 constant LCU per person | 32,133 constant LCU per person | 11,178 constant LCU per person | Finland |
| 2020s | 43,861 constant LCU per person | 35,121 constant LCU per person | 8,739 constant LCU per person | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gni (constant lcu), per capita, Finland or San Marino?
- Finland, at 43,085 constant LCU per person against 38,174 constant LCU per person in San Marino as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gni (constant lcu), per capita between Finland and San Marino?
- 4,911 constant LCU per person, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and San Marino?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2023.
- How do Finland and San Marino rank globally for gni (constant lcu), per capita?
- Finland ranks 102nd and San Marino ranks 105th of 170 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as GNI (constant LCU), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
GNI (constant LCU) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.