Cuba vs Iceland: GNI (constant LCU), annual growth rate
Cuba
-0.1465 % change on previous year
in 2019
Iceland
-0.4921 % change on previous year
in 2024
Cuba rank
145th
Iceland rank
148th
GNI (constant LCU), annual growth rate over time
- Cuba
- Iceland
How they compare
Cuba currently reports -0.1465 % change on previous year against -0.4921 % change on previous year in Iceland, a difference of 0.3456 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 145th and Iceland ranks 148th of 167 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 1 and Iceland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5.1 % change on previous year | 1.11 % change on previous year | 3.99 % change on previous year | Cuba |
| 2010s | 3.03 % change on previous year | 4.78 % change on previous year | 1.74 % change on previous year | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gni (constant lcu), annual growth rate, Cuba or Iceland?
- Cuba, at -0.1465 % change on previous year against -0.4921 % change on previous year in Iceland as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gni (constant lcu), annual growth rate between Cuba and Iceland?
- 0.3456 % change on previous year, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Iceland?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2019.
- How do Cuba and Iceland rank globally for gni (constant lcu), annual growth rate?
- Cuba ranks 145th and Iceland ranks 148th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as GNI (constant LCU), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in GNI (constant LCU). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.