Congo vs Eswatini: GNI (constant LCU), annual growth rate
Congo
-5.96 % change on previous year
in 2025
Eswatini
-4.2 % change on previous year
in 2024
Congo rank
162nd
Eswatini rank
160th
GNI (constant LCU), annual growth rate over time
- Congo
- Eswatini
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports -4.2 % change on previous year against -5.96 % change on previous year in Congo, a difference of 1.76 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 162nd and Eswatini ranks 160th of 167 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Eswatini in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -6.25 % change on previous year | 1.3 % change on previous year | 7.55 % change on previous year | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 0.6275 % change on previous year | 0.432 % change on previous year | 0.1955 % change on previous year | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gni (constant lcu), annual growth rate, Congo or Eswatini?
- Eswatini, at -4.2 % change on previous year against -5.96 % change on previous year in Congo as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gni (constant lcu), annual growth rate between Congo and Eswatini?
- 1.76 % change on previous year, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Eswatini?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2024.
- How do Congo and Eswatini rank globally for gni (constant lcu), annual growth rate?
- Congo ranks 162nd and Eswatini ranks 160th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as GNI (constant LCU), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in GNI (constant LCU). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.