Angola vs Eswatini: GNI (constant 2015 US$), per capita
Angola
3,190 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2024
Eswatini
3,162 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2024
Angola rank
112th
Eswatini rank
113th
GNI (constant 2015 US$), per capita over time
- Angola
- Eswatini
How they compare
Angola currently reports 3,190 constant 2015 US$ per person against 3,162 constant 2015 US$ per person in Eswatini, a difference of 28 constant 2015 US$ per person.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Angola ahead.
Angola ranks 112th and Eswatini ranks 113th of 161 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 1 and Eswatini in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 3,731 constant 2015 US$ per person | 3,239 constant 2015 US$ per person | 491.89 constant 2015 US$ per person | Angola |
| 2020s | 3,152 constant 2015 US$ per person | 3,197 constant 2015 US$ per person | 44.63 constant 2015 US$ per person | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gni (constant 2015 us$), per capita, Angola or Eswatini?
- Angola, at 3,190 constant 2015 US$ per person against 3,162 constant 2015 US$ per person in Eswatini as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gni (constant 2015 us$), per capita between Angola and Eswatini?
- 28 constant 2015 US$ per person, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Eswatini?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2024.
- How do Angola and Eswatini rank globally for gni (constant 2015 us$), per capita?
- Angola ranks 112th and Eswatini ranks 113th of 161 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as GNI (constant 2015 US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
GNI (constant 2015 US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.