Qatar vs Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries): GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per unit of GDP

Qatar
1.02 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)
0.9626 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Qatar rank
35th
Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
33rd

GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • Qatar
  • Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)
0.40.60.811.21.4197219982025

How they compare

Qatar currently reports 1.02 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.9626 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries), a difference of 0.0574 current US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Qatar's figure about 1.1 times Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)'s.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1985 it was Qatar ahead.

Qatar ranks 35th and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 33rd of 207 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Qatar averaged higher in 3 and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Qatar Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) Difference Ahead
1980s 1.2 current US$ per US$ of GDP 1.08 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1205 current US$ per US$ of GDP Qatar
1990s 1.05 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.9839 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0658 current US$ per US$ of GDP Qatar
2000s 0.863 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.9569 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0939 current US$ per US$ of GDP Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)
2010s 0.9596 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.9517 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0079 current US$ per US$ of GDP Qatar
2020s 0.9797 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.993 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0132 current US$ per US$ of GDP Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gni, atlas method (current us$), per unit of gdp, Qatar or Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)?
Qatar, at 1.02 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.9626 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) as of 2025.
What is the difference in gni, atlas method (current us$), per unit of gdp between Qatar and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)?
0.0574 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Qatar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Qatar and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)?
41 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 2025.
How do Qatar and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) rank globally for gni, atlas method (current us$), per unit of gdp?
Qatar ranks 35th and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 33rd of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Qatar vs Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries): GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-atlas-method-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/qatar/sub-saharan-africa-ida-and-ibrd-countries/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-atlas-method-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/qatar/sub-saharan-africa-ida-and-ibrd-countries/">Qatar vs Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries): GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
254 places, 13,209 data points, 1962–2025
Last refreshed

GNI, Atlas method (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.