Mauritius vs Post-demographic dividend: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per unit of GDP

Mauritius
1.08 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Post-demographic dividend
0.9868 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Mauritius rank
19th
Post-demographic dividend rank
22nd

GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • Mauritius
  • Post-demographic dividend
00.250.50.7511.2196219932025

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 1.08 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.9868 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Post-demographic dividend, a difference of 0.0932 current US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.1 times Post-demographic dividend's.

The two have swapped places 22 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Mauritius ahead.

Mauritius ranks 19th and Post-demographic dividend ranks 22nd of 207 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 4 and Post-demographic dividend in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Post-demographic dividend Difference Ahead
1960s 1.02 current US$ per US$ of GDP 1.01 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0147 current US$ per US$ of GDP Mauritius
1970s 1.01 current US$ per US$ of GDP 1.01 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0062 current US$ per US$ of GDP Post-demographic dividend
1980s 1.01 current US$ per US$ of GDP 1.01 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.002 current US$ per US$ of GDP Post-demographic dividend
1990s 1.01 current US$ per US$ of GDP 1 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0038 current US$ per US$ of GDP Mauritius
2000s 0.9884 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.9993 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0109 current US$ per US$ of GDP Post-demographic dividend
2010s 1.03 current US$ per US$ of GDP 1.01 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0232 current US$ per US$ of GDP Mauritius
2020s 1.13 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.9988 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1334 current US$ per US$ of GDP Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gni, atlas method (current us$), per unit of gdp, Mauritius or Post-demographic dividend?
Mauritius, at 1.08 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.9868 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Post-demographic dividend as of 2025.
What is the difference in gni, atlas method (current us$), per unit of gdp between Mauritius and Post-demographic dividend?
0.0932 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Post-demographic dividend?
64 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2025.
How do Mauritius and Post-demographic dividend rank globally for gni, atlas method (current us$), per unit of gdp?
Mauritius ranks 19th and Post-demographic dividend ranks 22nd of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Post-demographic dividend: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-atlas-method-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/mauritius/post-demographic-dividend/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-atlas-method-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/mauritius/post-demographic-dividend/">Mauritius vs Post-demographic dividend: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
254 places, 13,209 data points, 1962–2025
Last refreshed

GNI, Atlas method (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.