Hong Kong, China vs Lower middle income: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per unit of GDP

Hong Kong, China
1.1 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Lower middle income
1 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Hong Kong, China rank
16th
Lower middle income rank
14th

GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Lower middle income
00.250.50.7511.2196319942025

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 1.1 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 1 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Lower middle income, a difference of 0.1 current US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 1.1 times Lower middle income's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.

Hong Kong, China ranks 16th and Lower middle income ranks 14th of 207 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Hong Kong, China averaged higher in 4 and Lower middle income in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Lower middle income Difference Ahead
1960s 1.02 current US$ per US$ of GDP 1.07 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0519 current US$ per US$ of GDP Lower middle income
1970s 0.9909 current US$ per US$ of GDP 1.03 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0375 current US$ per US$ of GDP Lower middle income
1980s 1 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.993 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0084 current US$ per US$ of GDP Hong Kong, China
1990s 0.9646 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.9871 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0225 current US$ per US$ of GDP Lower middle income
2000s 1.07 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.9791 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0887 current US$ per US$ of GDP Hong Kong, China
2010s 1.01 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.9723 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0351 current US$ per US$ of GDP Hong Kong, China
2020s 1.08 current US$ per US$ of GDP 1 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0798 current US$ per US$ of GDP Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gni, atlas method (current us$), per unit of gdp, Hong Kong, China or Lower middle income?
Hong Kong, China, at 1.1 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 1 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Lower middle income as of 2025.
What is the difference in gni, atlas method (current us$), per unit of gdp between Hong Kong, China and Lower middle income?
0.1 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Lower middle income?
61 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2025.
How do Hong Kong, China and Lower middle income rank globally for gni, atlas method (current us$), per unit of gdp?
Hong Kong, China ranks 16th and Lower middle income ranks 14th of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Lower middle income: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-atlas-method-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/hong-kong-sar-china/lower-middle-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-atlas-method-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/hong-kong-sar-china/lower-middle-income/">Hong Kong, China vs Lower middle income: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
254 places, 13,209 data points, 1962–2025
Last refreshed

GNI, Atlas method (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.