Hong Kong, China vs Low & middle income: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per unit of GDP

Hong Kong, China
1.1 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Low & middle income
1 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Hong Kong, China rank
16th
Low & middle income rank
13th

GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Low & middle income
00.250.50.7511.2196219932025

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 1.1 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 1 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Low & middle income, a difference of 0.1 current US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 1.1 times Low & middle income's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1963 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.

Hong Kong, China ranks 16th and Low & middle income ranks 13th of 207 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Hong Kong, China averaged higher in 5 and Low & middle income in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Low & middle income Difference Ahead
1960s 1.02 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.9988 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0166 current US$ per US$ of GDP Hong Kong, China
1970s 0.9909 current US$ per US$ of GDP 1.01 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0151 current US$ per US$ of GDP Low & middle income
1980s 1 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.9969 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0045 current US$ per US$ of GDP Hong Kong, China
1990s 0.9646 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.9655 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0009 current US$ per US$ of GDP Low & middle income
2000s 1.07 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.9551 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1127 current US$ per US$ of GDP Hong Kong, China
2010s 1.01 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.972 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0353 current US$ per US$ of GDP Hong Kong, China
2020s 1.08 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.9969 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0851 current US$ per US$ of GDP Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gni, atlas method (current us$), per unit of gdp, Hong Kong, China or Low & middle income?
Hong Kong, China, at 1.1 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 1 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Low & middle income as of 2025.
What is the difference in gni, atlas method (current us$), per unit of gdp between Hong Kong, China and Low & middle income?
0.1 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Low & middle income?
63 years are reported by both, from 1963 to 2025.
How do Hong Kong, China and Low & middle income rank globally for gni, atlas method (current us$), per unit of gdp?
Hong Kong, China ranks 16th and Low & middle income ranks 13th of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Low & middle income: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-atlas-method-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/hong-kong-sar-china/low-and-middle-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-atlas-method-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/hong-kong-sar-china/low-and-middle-income/">Hong Kong, China vs Low & middle income: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
254 places, 13,209 data points, 1962–2025
Last refreshed

GNI, Atlas method (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.