Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Palau: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per unit of GDP

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
0.9279 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Palau
1.02 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank
42nd
Palau rank
39th

GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
  • Palau
00.250.50.7511.2196319942025

How they compare

Palau currently reports 1.02 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.9279 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), a difference of 0.0921 current US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Palau's figure about 1.1 times Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1972 it was Palau ahead.

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 42nd and Palau ranks 39th of 45 groups.

Across the 6 decades both report, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) averaged higher in 1 and Palau in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) Palau Difference Ahead
1970s 0.9854 current US$ per US$ of GDP 1.15 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1653 current US$ per US$ of GDP Palau
1980s 1.01 current US$ per US$ of GDP 1.1 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0911 current US$ per US$ of GDP Palau
1990s 0.9574 current US$ per US$ of GDP 1.11 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.153 current US$ per US$ of GDP Palau
2000s 0.9024 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.9508 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0484 current US$ per US$ of GDP Palau
2010s 0.9628 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.9464 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0163 current US$ per US$ of GDP Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
2020s 0.9533 current US$ per US$ of GDP 1 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0506 current US$ per US$ of GDP Palau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gni, atlas method (current us$), per unit of gdp, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) or Palau?
Palau, at 1.02 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.9279 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) as of 2025.
What is the difference in gni, atlas method (current us$), per unit of gdp between Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Palau?
0.0921 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Palau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Palau?
54 years are reported by both, from 1972 to 2025.
How do Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Palau rank globally for gni, atlas method (current us$), per unit of gdp?
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 42nd and Palau ranks 39th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Palau: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-atlas-method-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/palau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-atlas-method-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/palau/">Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Palau: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
254 places, 13,209 data points, 1962–2025
Last refreshed

GNI, Atlas method (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.