Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Sweden: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per unit of GDP

Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
0.904 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Sweden
0.998 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
44th
Sweden rank
47th

GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
  • Sweden
00.250.50.7511.2196219932025

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 0.998 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.904 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries), a difference of 0.094 current US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Sweden's figure about 1.1 times Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)'s.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) ahead.

Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 44th and Sweden ranks 47th of 45 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) Sweden Difference Ahead
1990s 1 current US$ per US$ of GDP 1 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0018 current US$ per US$ of GDP Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
2000s 0.9159 current US$ per US$ of GDP 1.01 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.097 current US$ per US$ of GDP Sweden
2010s 0.9816 current US$ per US$ of GDP 1.03 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0471 current US$ per US$ of GDP Sweden
2020s 0.9437 current US$ per US$ of GDP 1.05 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1024 current US$ per US$ of GDP Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gni, atlas method (current us$), per unit of gdp, Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) or Sweden?
Sweden, at 0.998 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.904 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) as of 2025.
What is the difference in gni, atlas method (current us$), per unit of gdp between Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) and Sweden?
0.094 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) and Sweden?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) and Sweden rank globally for gni, atlas method (current us$), per unit of gdp?
Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 44th and Sweden ranks 47th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Sweden: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-atlas-method-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/europe-and-central-asia-ida-and-ibrd-countries/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-atlas-method-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/europe-and-central-asia-ida-and-ibrd-countries/sweden/">Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Sweden: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
254 places, 13,209 data points, 1962–2025
Last refreshed

GNI, Atlas method (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.