East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Naoero: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per unit of GDP

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
1.02 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Naoero
1.41 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank
6th
Naoero rank
3rd

GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
  • Naoero
00.511.5196219932025

How they compare

Naoero currently reports 1.41 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 1.02 current US$ per US$ of GDP in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 0.39 current US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Naoero's figure about 1.4 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1972 it was Naoero ahead.

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 6th and Naoero ranks 3rd of 45 groups.

Naoero has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) Naoero Difference Ahead
1970s 1.05 current US$ per US$ of GDP 1.21 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1591 current US$ per US$ of GDP Naoero
1980s 1.04 current US$ per US$ of GDP 1.22 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1789 current US$ per US$ of GDP Naoero
1990s 0.991 current US$ per US$ of GDP 1.17 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1767 current US$ per US$ of GDP Naoero
2000s 0.9606 current US$ per US$ of GDP 1.14 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1798 current US$ per US$ of GDP Naoero
2010s 0.9678 current US$ per US$ of GDP 1.24 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2749 current US$ per US$ of GDP Naoero
2020s 1.01 current US$ per US$ of GDP 1.52 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.5092 current US$ per US$ of GDP Naoero

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gni, atlas method (current us$), per unit of gdp, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or Naoero?
Naoero, at 1.41 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 1.02 current US$ per US$ of GDP in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2025.
What is the difference in gni, atlas method (current us$), per unit of gdp between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Naoero?
0.39 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Naoero ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Naoero?
54 years are reported by both, from 1972 to 2025.
How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Naoero rank globally for gni, atlas method (current us$), per unit of gdp?
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 6th and Naoero ranks 3rd of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Naoero: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-atlas-method-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/naoero/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-atlas-method-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/naoero/">East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Naoero: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
254 places, 13,209 data points, 1962–2025
Last refreshed

GNI, Atlas method (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.