Early-demographic dividend vs Libya: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per unit of GDP

Early-demographic dividend
0.9958 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Libya
1.12 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Early-demographic dividend rank
15th
Libya rank
13th

GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • Early-demographic dividend
  • Libya
00.511.5196219932025

How they compare

Libya currently reports 1.12 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.9958 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Early-demographic dividend, a difference of 0.1242 current US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Libya's figure about 1.1 times Early-demographic dividend's.

The two have swapped places 21 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Early-demographic dividend ahead.

Early-demographic dividend ranks 15th and Libya ranks 13th of 45 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, Early-demographic dividend averaged higher in 3 and Libya in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Early-demographic dividend Libya Difference Ahead
1960s 0.989 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.8445 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1445 current US$ per US$ of GDP Early-demographic dividend
1970s 0.9922 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.9335 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0587 current US$ per US$ of GDP Early-demographic dividend
1980s 1.01 current US$ per US$ of GDP 1.02 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.006 current US$ per US$ of GDP Libya
1990s 0.9772 current US$ per US$ of GDP 1.01 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0358 current US$ per US$ of GDP Libya
2000s 0.9591 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.9846 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0254 current US$ per US$ of GDP Libya
2010s 0.9832 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.9825 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0007 current US$ per US$ of GDP Early-demographic dividend
2020s 0.9858 current US$ per US$ of GDP 1.11 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1219 current US$ per US$ of GDP Libya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gni, atlas method (current us$), per unit of gdp, Early-demographic dividend or Libya?
Libya, at 1.12 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.9958 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Early-demographic dividend as of 2025.
What is the difference in gni, atlas method (current us$), per unit of gdp between Early-demographic dividend and Libya?
0.1242 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Libya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Early-demographic dividend and Libya?
64 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2025.
How do Early-demographic dividend and Libya rank globally for gni, atlas method (current us$), per unit of gdp?
Early-demographic dividend ranks 15th and Libya ranks 13th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Early-demographic dividend vs Libya: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-atlas-method-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/early-demographic-dividend/libya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-atlas-method-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/early-demographic-dividend/libya/">Early-demographic dividend vs Libya: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
254 places, 13,209 data points, 1962–2025
Last refreshed

GNI, Atlas method (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.