Early-demographic dividend vs Hong Kong, China: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per unit of GDP

Early-demographic dividend
0.9958 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Hong Kong, China
1.1 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Early-demographic dividend rank
15th
Hong Kong, China rank
16th

GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • Early-demographic dividend
  • Hong Kong, China
00.250.50.7511.2196219932025

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 1.1 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.9958 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Early-demographic dividend, a difference of 0.1042 current US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 1.1 times Early-demographic dividend's.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1963 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.

Early-demographic dividend ranks 15th and Hong Kong, China ranks 16th of 45 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, Early-demographic dividend averaged higher in 3 and Hong Kong, China in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Early-demographic dividend Hong Kong, China Difference Ahead
1960s 0.9865 current US$ per US$ of GDP 1.02 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0289 current US$ per US$ of GDP Hong Kong, China
1970s 0.9922 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.9909 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0013 current US$ per US$ of GDP Early-demographic dividend
1980s 1.01 current US$ per US$ of GDP 1 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.012 current US$ per US$ of GDP Early-demographic dividend
1990s 0.9772 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.9646 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0126 current US$ per US$ of GDP Early-demographic dividend
2000s 0.9591 current US$ per US$ of GDP 1.07 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1086 current US$ per US$ of GDP Hong Kong, China
2010s 0.9832 current US$ per US$ of GDP 1.01 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0241 current US$ per US$ of GDP Hong Kong, China
2020s 0.9858 current US$ per US$ of GDP 1.08 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0962 current US$ per US$ of GDP Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gni, atlas method (current us$), per unit of gdp, Early-demographic dividend or Hong Kong, China?
Hong Kong, China, at 1.1 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.9958 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Early-demographic dividend as of 2025.
What is the difference in gni, atlas method (current us$), per unit of gdp between Early-demographic dividend and Hong Kong, China?
0.1042 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Early-demographic dividend and Hong Kong, China?
63 years are reported by both, from 1963 to 2025.
How do Early-demographic dividend and Hong Kong, China rank globally for gni, atlas method (current us$), per unit of gdp?
Early-demographic dividend ranks 15th and Hong Kong, China ranks 16th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Early-demographic dividend vs Hong Kong, China: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-atlas-method-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/early-demographic-dividend/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-atlas-method-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/early-demographic-dividend/hong-kong-sar-china/">Early-demographic dividend vs Hong Kong, China: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
254 places, 13,209 data points, 1962–2025
Last refreshed

GNI, Atlas method (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.