Central African Republic vs Mauritania: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per unit of GDP

Central African Republic
1.01 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Mauritania
1.01 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Central African Republic rank
43rd
Mauritania rank
45th

GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Mauritania
00.511.5196219932025

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 1.01 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 1.01 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Mauritania, a difference of 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 23 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1963 it was Mauritania ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 43rd and Mauritania ranks 45th of 207 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 5 and Mauritania in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Mauritania Difference Ahead
1960s 0.9819 current US$ per US$ of GDP 1 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0219 current US$ per US$ of GDP Mauritania
1970s 0.995 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.9791 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0159 current US$ per US$ of GDP Central African Republic
1980s 0.997 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.9898 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0072 current US$ per US$ of GDP Central African Republic
1990s 1.04 current US$ per US$ of GDP 1 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.044 current US$ per US$ of GDP Central African Republic
2000s 0.9707 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.9773 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0065 current US$ per US$ of GDP Mauritania
2010s 1.01 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.9746 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0357 current US$ per US$ of GDP Central African Republic
2020s 1.05 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.9884 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0582 current US$ per US$ of GDP Central African Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gni, atlas method (current us$), per unit of gdp, Central African Republic or Mauritania?
Central African Republic, at 1.01 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 1.01 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Mauritania as of 2025.
What is the difference in gni, atlas method (current us$), per unit of gdp between Central African Republic and Mauritania?
0 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Mauritania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1963 to 2025.
How do Central African Republic and Mauritania rank globally for gni, atlas method (current us$), per unit of gdp?
Central African Republic ranks 43rd and Mauritania ranks 45th of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Mauritania: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-atlas-method-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/central-african-republic/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-atlas-method-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/central-african-republic/mauritania/">Central African Republic vs Mauritania: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
254 places, 13,209 data points, 1962–2025
Last refreshed

GNI, Atlas method (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.