Canada vs Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries): GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per unit of GDP

Canada
1.01 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
0.904 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Canada rank
41st
Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
44th

GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • Canada
  • Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
00.250.50.7511.2196219932025

How they compare

Canada currently reports 1.01 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.904 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries), a difference of 0.106 current US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Canada's figure about 1.1 times Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)'s.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) ahead.

Canada ranks 41st and Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 44th of 207 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 3 and Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) Difference Ahead
1990s 0.9995 current US$ per US$ of GDP 1 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0028 current US$ per US$ of GDP Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
2000s 0.9528 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.9159 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0368 current US$ per US$ of GDP Canada
2010s 0.9889 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.9816 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0073 current US$ per US$ of GDP Canada
2020s 0.9831 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.9437 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0394 current US$ per US$ of GDP Canada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gni, atlas method (current us$), per unit of gdp, Canada or Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)?
Canada, at 1.01 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.904 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) as of 2025.
What is the difference in gni, atlas method (current us$), per unit of gdp between Canada and Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)?
0.106 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Canada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do Canada and Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) rank globally for gni, atlas method (current us$), per unit of gdp?
Canada ranks 41st and Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 44th of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries): GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-atlas-method-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/canada/europe-and-central-asia-ida-and-ibrd-countries/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-atlas-method-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/canada/europe-and-central-asia-ida-and-ibrd-countries/">Canada vs Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries): GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
254 places, 13,209 data points, 1962–2025
Last refreshed

GNI, Atlas method (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.