Sweden vs Turks and Caicos Islands: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre

Sweden
1.57 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands
1.75 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sweden rank
67th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
64th

GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Sweden
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
0500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M196219922023

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 1.75 million current US$ per square kilometre against 1.57 million current US$ per square kilometre in Sweden, a difference of 187,310 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Turks and Caicos Islands's figure about 1.1 times Sweden's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Sweden ahead.

Sweden ranks 67th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 64th of 205 countries.

Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sweden Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
2010s 1.37 million current US$ per square kilometre 1.32 million current US$ per square kilometre 57,167 current US$ per square kilometre Sweden
2020s 1.52 million current US$ per square kilometre 1.39 million current US$ per square kilometre 129,648 current US$ per square kilometre Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gni, atlas method (current us$), per square kilometre, Sweden or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Turks and Caicos Islands, at 1.75 million current US$ per square kilometre against 1.57 million current US$ per square kilometre in Sweden as of 2023.
What is the difference in gni, atlas method (current us$), per square kilometre between Sweden and Turks and Caicos Islands?
187,310 current US$ per square kilometre, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sweden and Turks and Caicos Islands?
10 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2023.
How do Sweden and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for gni, atlas method (current us$), per square kilometre?
Sweden ranks 67th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 64th of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sweden vs Turks and Caicos Islands: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-atlas-method-current-us-per-square-kilometre/sweden/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-atlas-method-current-us-per-square-kilometre/sweden/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Sweden vs Turks and Caicos Islands: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
252 places, 12,469 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

GNI, Atlas method (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.