Sierra Leone vs Zimbabwe: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre

Sierra Leone
101,679 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
107,674 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sierra Leone rank
162nd
Zimbabwe rank
159th

GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Sierra Leone
  • Zimbabwe
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k196219922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 107,674 current US$ per square kilometre against 101,679 current US$ per square kilometre in Sierra Leone, a difference of 5,995 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Sierra Leone's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 60 shared years of data; in 1964 it was Sierra Leone ahead.

Sierra Leone ranks 162nd and Zimbabwe ranks 159th of 205 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Sierra Leone averaged higher in 5 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sierra Leone Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 5,359 current US$ per square kilometre 3,121 current US$ per square kilometre 2,237 current US$ per square kilometre Sierra Leone
1970s 9,014 current US$ per square kilometre 8,899 current US$ per square kilometre 114.8 current US$ per square kilometre Sierra Leone
1980s 13,541 current US$ per square kilometre 16,533 current US$ per square kilometre 2,992 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 10,333 current US$ per square kilometre 15,089 current US$ per square kilometre 4,756 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 30,648 current US$ per square kilometre 10,204 current US$ per square kilometre 20,444 current US$ per square kilometre Sierra Leone
2010s 82,980 current US$ per square kilometre 52,746 current US$ per square kilometre 30,235 current US$ per square kilometre Sierra Leone
2020s 99,685 current US$ per square kilometre 97,291 current US$ per square kilometre 2,394 current US$ per square kilometre Sierra Leone

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gni, atlas method (current us$), per square kilometre, Sierra Leone or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 107,674 current US$ per square kilometre against 101,679 current US$ per square kilometre in Sierra Leone as of 2023.
What is the difference in gni, atlas method (current us$), per square kilometre between Sierra Leone and Zimbabwe?
5,995 current US$ per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sierra Leone and Zimbabwe?
60 years are reported by both, from 1964 to 2023.
How do Sierra Leone and Zimbabwe rank globally for gni, atlas method (current us$), per square kilometre?
Sierra Leone ranks 162nd and Zimbabwe ranks 159th of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sierra Leone vs Zimbabwe: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-atlas-method-current-us-per-square-kilometre/sierra-leone/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-atlas-method-current-us-per-square-kilometre/sierra-leone/zimbabwe/">Sierra Leone vs Zimbabwe: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
252 places, 12,469 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

GNI, Atlas method (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.