Norway vs Philippines: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre

Norway
1.54 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Philippines
1.66 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Norway rank
68th
Philippines rank
66th

GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Norway
  • Philippines
0500.0k1.0M1.5M196219922023

How they compare

Philippines currently reports 1.66 million current US$ per square kilometre against 1.54 million current US$ per square kilometre in Norway, a difference of 120,190 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Philippines's figure about 1.1 times Norway's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Philippines ahead.

Norway ranks 68th and Philippines ranks 66th of 205 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Norway averaged higher in 5 and Philippines in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Norway Philippines Difference Ahead
1960s 22,630 current US$ per square kilometre 24,307 current US$ per square kilometre 1,677 current US$ per square kilometre Philippines
1970s 82,113 current US$ per square kilometre 57,192 current US$ per square kilometre 24,921 current US$ per square kilometre Norway
1980s 206,126 current US$ per square kilometre 132,259 current US$ per square kilometre 73,867 current US$ per square kilometre Norway
1990s 386,602 current US$ per square kilometre 256,874 current US$ per square kilometre 129,728 current US$ per square kilometre Norway
2000s 769,763 current US$ per square kilometre 425,816 current US$ per square kilometre 343,947 current US$ per square kilometre Norway
2010s 1.27 million current US$ per square kilometre 1.10 million current US$ per square kilometre 173,822 current US$ per square kilometre Norway
2020s 1.35 million current US$ per square kilometre 1.45 million current US$ per square kilometre 102,800 current US$ per square kilometre Philippines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gni, atlas method (current us$), per square kilometre, Norway or Philippines?
Philippines, at 1.66 million current US$ per square kilometre against 1.54 million current US$ per square kilometre in Norway as of 2023.
What is the difference in gni, atlas method (current us$), per square kilometre between Norway and Philippines?
120,190 current US$ per square kilometre, with Philippines ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Philippines?
62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
How do Norway and Philippines rank globally for gni, atlas method (current us$), per square kilometre?
Norway ranks 68th and Philippines ranks 66th of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Norway vs Philippines: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-atlas-method-current-us-per-square-kilometre/norway/philippines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-atlas-method-current-us-per-square-kilometre/norway/philippines/">Norway vs Philippines: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
252 places, 12,469 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

GNI, Atlas method (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.