Mauritius vs United Arab Emirates: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre

Mauritius
7.84 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
United Arab Emirates
7.54 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius rank
30th
United Arab Emirates rank
32nd

GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Mauritius
  • United Arab Emirates
02.0M4.0M6.0M8.0M196219922023

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 7.84 million current US$ per square kilometre against 7.54 million current US$ per square kilometre in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 292,250 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1972 it was Mauritius ahead.

Mauritius ranks 30th and United Arab Emirates ranks 32nd of 205 countries.

Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius United Arab Emirates Difference Ahead
1970s 362,026 current US$ per square kilometre 222,748 current US$ per square kilometre 139,278 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
1980s 712,137 current US$ per square kilometre 618,701 current US$ per square kilometre 93,436 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
1990s 1.85 million current US$ per square kilometre 945,853 current US$ per square kilometre 900,532 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 3.31 million current US$ per square kilometre 2.49 million current US$ per square kilometre 827,710 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
2010s 6.60 million current US$ per square kilometre 5.52 million current US$ per square kilometre 1.08 million current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
2020s 7.26 million current US$ per square kilometre 6.38 million current US$ per square kilometre 884,670 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gni, atlas method (current us$), per square kilometre, Mauritius or United Arab Emirates?
Mauritius, at 7.84 million current US$ per square kilometre against 7.54 million current US$ per square kilometre in United Arab Emirates as of 2023.
What is the difference in gni, atlas method (current us$), per square kilometre between Mauritius and United Arab Emirates?
292,250 current US$ per square kilometre, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and United Arab Emirates?
52 years are reported by both, from 1972 to 2023.
How do Mauritius and United Arab Emirates rank globally for gni, atlas method (current us$), per square kilometre?
Mauritius ranks 30th and United Arab Emirates ranks 32nd of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs United Arab Emirates: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-atlas-method-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/united-arab-emirates/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-atlas-method-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/united-arab-emirates/">Mauritius vs United Arab Emirates: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
252 places, 12,469 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

GNI, Atlas method (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.