Lower middle income vs Naoero: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre

Lower middle income
366,918 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Naoero
13.28 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Lower middle income rank
22nd
Naoero rank
23rd

GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Lower middle income
  • Naoero
05.0M10.0M15.0M196519942023

How they compare

Naoero currently reports 13.28 million current US$ per square kilometre against 366,918 current US$ per square kilometre in Lower middle income, a difference of 12.92 million current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Naoero's figure about 36.2 times Lower middle income's.

Across all 52 years both countries report, Naoero has been ahead every year.

Lower middle income ranks 22nd and Naoero ranks 23rd of 45 groups.

Naoero has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lower middle income Naoero Difference Ahead
1970s 16,150 current US$ per square kilometre 2.22 million current US$ per square kilometre 2.20 million current US$ per square kilometre Naoero
1980s 33,984 current US$ per square kilometre 2.84 million current US$ per square kilometre 2.81 million current US$ per square kilometre Naoero
1990s 47,181 current US$ per square kilometre 2.40 million current US$ per square kilometre 2.35 million current US$ per square kilometre Naoero
2000s 99,854 current US$ per square kilometre 1.62 million current US$ per square kilometre 1.52 million current US$ per square kilometre Naoero
2010s 241,731 current US$ per square kilometre 5.98 million current US$ per square kilometre 5.74 million current US$ per square kilometre Naoero
2020s 333,339 current US$ per square kilometre 11.77 million current US$ per square kilometre 11.44 million current US$ per square kilometre Naoero

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gni, atlas method (current us$), per square kilometre, Lower middle income or Naoero?
Naoero, at 13.28 million current US$ per square kilometre against 366,918 current US$ per square kilometre in Lower middle income as of 2023.
What is the difference in gni, atlas method (current us$), per square kilometre between Lower middle income and Naoero?
12.92 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Naoero ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lower middle income and Naoero?
52 years are reported by both, from 1972 to 2023.
How do Lower middle income and Naoero rank globally for gni, atlas method (current us$), per square kilometre?
Lower middle income ranks 22nd and Naoero ranks 23rd of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lower middle income vs Naoero: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-atlas-method-current-us-per-square-kilometre/lower-middle-income/naoero/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-atlas-method-current-us-per-square-kilometre/lower-middle-income/naoero/">Lower middle income vs Naoero: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
252 places, 12,469 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

GNI, Atlas method (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.