Jordan vs Sao Tome and Principe: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre

Jordan
630,329 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
675,259 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Jordan rank
102nd
Sao Tome and Principe rank
99th

GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Jordan
  • Sao Tome and Principe
0200.0k400.0k600.0k197219972023

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 675,259 current US$ per square kilometre against 630,329 current US$ per square kilometre in Jordan, a difference of 44,930 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.1 times Jordan's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 46 shared years of data; in 1978 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Jordan ranks 102nd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 99th of 205 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 3 and Sao Tome and Principe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jordan Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1970s 34,888 current US$ per square kilometre 72,259 current US$ per square kilometre 37,372 current US$ per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1980s 60,393 current US$ per square kilometre 92,448 current US$ per square kilometre 32,055 current US$ per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1990s 68,187 current US$ per square kilometre 103,404 current US$ per square kilometre 35,217 current US$ per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 159,824 current US$ per square kilometre 127,554 current US$ per square kilometre 32,270 current US$ per square kilometre Jordan
2010s 439,045 current US$ per square kilometre 288,864 current US$ per square kilometre 150,181 current US$ per square kilometre Jordan
2020s 591,021 current US$ per square kilometre 578,445 current US$ per square kilometre 12,576 current US$ per square kilometre Jordan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gni, atlas method (current us$), per square kilometre, Jordan or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 675,259 current US$ per square kilometre against 630,329 current US$ per square kilometre in Jordan as of 2023.
What is the difference in gni, atlas method (current us$), per square kilometre between Jordan and Sao Tome and Principe?
44,930 current US$ per square kilometre, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Sao Tome and Principe?
46 years are reported by both, from 1978 to 2023.
How do Jordan and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for gni, atlas method (current us$), per square kilometre?
Jordan ranks 102nd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 99th of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jordan vs Sao Tome and Principe: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-atlas-method-current-us-per-square-kilometre/jordan/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-atlas-method-current-us-per-square-kilometre/jordan/sao-tome-and-principe/">Jordan vs Sao Tome and Principe: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
252 places, 12,469 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

GNI, Atlas method (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.