Jamaica vs Philippines: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre

Jamaica
1.80 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Philippines
1.66 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Jamaica rank
63rd
Philippines rank
66th

GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Jamaica
  • Philippines
0500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M196219922023

How they compare

Jamaica currently reports 1.80 million current US$ per square kilometre against 1.66 million current US$ per square kilometre in Philippines, a difference of 136,650 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Jamaica's figure about 1.1 times Philippines's.

Across all 56 years both countries report, Jamaica has been ahead every year.

Jamaica ranks 63rd and Philippines ranks 66th of 205 countries.

Jamaica has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jamaica Philippines Difference Ahead
1960s 107,806 current US$ per square kilometre 29,972 current US$ per square kilometre 77,834 current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
1970s 216,898 current US$ per square kilometre 57,192 current US$ per square kilometre 159,707 current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
1980s 268,142 current US$ per square kilometre 132,259 current US$ per square kilometre 135,882 current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
1990s 525,635 current US$ per square kilometre 256,874 current US$ per square kilometre 268,761 current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
2000s 957,415 current US$ per square kilometre 425,816 current US$ per square kilometre 531,598 current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
2010s 1.32 million current US$ per square kilometre 1.10 million current US$ per square kilometre 224,590 current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
2020s 1.59 million current US$ per square kilometre 1.45 million current US$ per square kilometre 135,332 current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gni, atlas method (current us$), per square kilometre, Jamaica or Philippines?
Jamaica, at 1.80 million current US$ per square kilometre against 1.66 million current US$ per square kilometre in Philippines as of 2023.
What is the difference in gni, atlas method (current us$), per square kilometre between Jamaica and Philippines?
136,650 current US$ per square kilometre, with Jamaica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Philippines?
56 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2023.
How do Jamaica and Philippines rank globally for gni, atlas method (current us$), per square kilometre?
Jamaica ranks 63rd and Philippines ranks 66th of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jamaica vs Philippines: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-atlas-method-current-us-per-square-kilometre/jamaica/philippines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-atlas-method-current-us-per-square-kilometre/jamaica/philippines/">Jamaica vs Philippines: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
252 places, 12,469 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

GNI, Atlas method (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.