IDA & IBRD total vs Japan: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre

IDA & IBRD total
442,272 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Japan
13.91 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
IDA & IBRD total rank
19th
Japan rank
21st

GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • IDA & IBRD total
  • Japan
05.0M10.0M15.0M20.0M196219922023

How they compare

Japan currently reports 13.91 million current US$ per square kilometre against 442,272 current US$ per square kilometre in IDA & IBRD total, a difference of 13.47 million current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Japan's figure about 31.5 times IDA & IBRD total's.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.

IDA & IBRD total ranks 19th and Japan ranks 21st of 45 groups.

Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade IDA & IBRD total Japan Difference Ahead
1960s 6,664 current US$ per square kilometre 308,354 current US$ per square kilometre 301,690 current US$ per square kilometre Japan
1970s 18,682 current US$ per square kilometre 1.53 million current US$ per square kilometre 1.51 million current US$ per square kilometre Japan
1980s 42,202 current US$ per square kilometre 5.10 million current US$ per square kilometre 5.06 million current US$ per square kilometre Japan
1990s 55,434 current US$ per square kilometre 12.50 million current US$ per square kilometre 12.44 million current US$ per square kilometre Japan
2000s 111,679 current US$ per square kilometre 13.61 million current US$ per square kilometre 13.50 million current US$ per square kilometre Japan
2010s 293,376 current US$ per square kilometre 15.43 million current US$ per square kilometre 15.14 million current US$ per square kilometre Japan
2020s 398,458 current US$ per square kilometre 14.80 million current US$ per square kilometre 14.40 million current US$ per square kilometre Japan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gni, atlas method (current us$), per square kilometre, IDA & IBRD total or Japan?
Japan, at 13.91 million current US$ per square kilometre against 442,272 current US$ per square kilometre in IDA & IBRD total as of 2023.
What is the difference in gni, atlas method (current us$), per square kilometre between IDA & IBRD total and Japan?
13.47 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Japan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IDA & IBRD total and Japan?
62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
How do IDA & IBRD total and Japan rank globally for gni, atlas method (current us$), per square kilometre?
IDA & IBRD total ranks 19th and Japan ranks 21st of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IDA & IBRD total vs Japan: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-atlas-method-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ida-and-ibrd-total/japan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-atlas-method-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ida-and-ibrd-total/japan/">IDA & IBRD total vs Japan: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
252 places, 12,469 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

GNI, Atlas method (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.