Hong Kong, China vs Malta: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre

Hong Kong, China
393.83 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta
61.71 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Hong Kong, China rank
3rd
Malta rank
5th

GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Malta
0100.0M200.0M300.0M400.0M196319932023

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 393.83 million current US$ per square kilometre against 61.71 million current US$ per square kilometre in Malta, a difference of 332.12 million current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 6.4 times Malta's.

Across all 52 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.

Hong Kong, China ranks 3rd and Malta ranks 5th of 205 countries.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Malta Difference Ahead
1970s 12.80 million current US$ per square kilometre 1.95 million current US$ per square kilometre 10.84 million current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
1980s 41.36 million current US$ per square kilometre 4.94 million current US$ per square kilometre 36.42 million current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
1990s 126.89 million current US$ per square kilometre 10.86 million current US$ per square kilometre 116.03 million current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
2000s 188.86 million current US$ per square kilometre 18.87 million current US$ per square kilometre 169.99 million current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
2010s 288.25 million current US$ per square kilometre 34.93 million current US$ per square kilometre 253.33 million current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
2020s 375.36 million current US$ per square kilometre 53.85 million current US$ per square kilometre 321.51 million current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gni, atlas method (current us$), per square kilometre, Hong Kong, China or Malta?
Hong Kong, China, at 393.83 million current US$ per square kilometre against 61.71 million current US$ per square kilometre in Malta as of 2023.
What is the difference in gni, atlas method (current us$), per square kilometre between Hong Kong, China and Malta?
332.12 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Malta?
52 years are reported by both, from 1972 to 2023.
How do Hong Kong, China and Malta rank globally for gni, atlas method (current us$), per square kilometre?
Hong Kong, China ranks 3rd and Malta ranks 5th of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Malta: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-atlas-method-current-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-atlas-method-current-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/malta/">Hong Kong, China vs Malta: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
252 places, 12,469 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

GNI, Atlas method (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.