Guatemala vs New Zealand: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre

Guatemala
925,563 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand
976,974 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
85th
New Zealand rank
82nd

GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Guatemala
  • New Zealand
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k1.0M196219922023

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 976,974 current US$ per square kilometre against 925,563 current US$ per square kilometre in Guatemala, a difference of 51,411 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Guatemala's.

Across all 62 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Guatemala ranks 85th and New Zealand ranks 82nd of 205 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala New Zealand Difference Ahead
1960s 13,237 current US$ per square kilometre 24,299 current US$ per square kilometre 11,062 current US$ per square kilometre New Zealand
1970s 35,901 current US$ per square kilometre 49,116 current US$ per square kilometre 13,215 current US$ per square kilometre New Zealand
1980s 80,227 current US$ per square kilometre 109,179 current US$ per square kilometre 28,952 current US$ per square kilometre New Zealand
1990s 124,104 current US$ per square kilometre 199,205 current US$ per square kilometre 75,101 current US$ per square kilometre New Zealand
2000s 243,767 current US$ per square kilometre 343,685 current US$ per square kilometre 99,919 current US$ per square kilometre New Zealand
2010s 528,639 current US$ per square kilometre 674,750 current US$ per square kilometre 146,111 current US$ per square kilometre New Zealand
2020s 822,395 current US$ per square kilometre 903,677 current US$ per square kilometre 81,282 current US$ per square kilometre New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gni, atlas method (current us$), per square kilometre, Guatemala or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 976,974 current US$ per square kilometre against 925,563 current US$ per square kilometre in Guatemala as of 2023.
What is the difference in gni, atlas method (current us$), per square kilometre between Guatemala and New Zealand?
51,411 current US$ per square kilometre, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and New Zealand?
62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and New Zealand rank globally for gni, atlas method (current us$), per square kilometre?
Guatemala ranks 85th and New Zealand ranks 82nd of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs New Zealand: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-atlas-method-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-atlas-method-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/new-zealand/">Guatemala vs New Zealand: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
252 places, 12,469 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

GNI, Atlas method (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.