Denmark vs Mauritius: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre

Denmark
10.72 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius
7.84 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Denmark rank
27th
Mauritius rank
30th

GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Denmark
  • Mauritius
02.5M5.0M7.5M10.0M196219922023

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 10.72 million current US$ per square kilometre against 7.84 million current US$ per square kilometre in Mauritius, a difference of 2.88 million current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Denmark's figure about 1.4 times Mauritius's.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Denmark has been ahead every year.

Denmark ranks 27th and Mauritius ranks 30th of 205 countries.

Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Mauritius Difference Ahead
1960s 277,416 current US$ per square kilometre 112,483 current US$ per square kilometre 164,933 current US$ per square kilometre Denmark
1970s 952,841 current US$ per square kilometre 313,554 current US$ per square kilometre 639,287 current US$ per square kilometre Denmark
1980s 1.97 million current US$ per square kilometre 712,137 current US$ per square kilometre 1.26 million current US$ per square kilometre Denmark
1990s 4.01 million current US$ per square kilometre 1.85 million current US$ per square kilometre 2.16 million current US$ per square kilometre Denmark
2000s 6.15 million current US$ per square kilometre 3.31 million current US$ per square kilometre 2.83 million current US$ per square kilometre Denmark
2010s 8.67 million current US$ per square kilometre 6.60 million current US$ per square kilometre 2.06 million current US$ per square kilometre Denmark
2020s 10.18 million current US$ per square kilometre 7.26 million current US$ per square kilometre 2.92 million current US$ per square kilometre Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gni, atlas method (current us$), per square kilometre, Denmark or Mauritius?
Denmark, at 10.72 million current US$ per square kilometre against 7.84 million current US$ per square kilometre in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in gni, atlas method (current us$), per square kilometre between Denmark and Mauritius?
2.88 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Mauritius?
62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
How do Denmark and Mauritius rank globally for gni, atlas method (current us$), per square kilometre?
Denmark ranks 27th and Mauritius ranks 30th of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs Mauritius: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-atlas-method-current-us-per-square-kilometre/denmark/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-atlas-method-current-us-per-square-kilometre/denmark/mauritius/">Denmark vs Mauritius: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
252 places, 12,469 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

GNI, Atlas method (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.