Denmark vs Germany: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre

Denmark
10.72 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Germany
13.21 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Denmark rank
27th
Germany rank
24th

GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Denmark
  • Germany
05.0M10.0M15.0M196219922023

How they compare

Germany currently reports 13.21 million current US$ per square kilometre against 10.72 million current US$ per square kilometre in Denmark, a difference of 2.49 million current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Germany's figure about 1.2 times Denmark's.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Germany has been ahead every year.

Denmark ranks 27th and Germany ranks 24th of 205 countries.

Germany has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Germany Difference Ahead
1960s 277,416 current US$ per square kilometre 392,848 current US$ per square kilometre 115,432 current US$ per square kilometre Germany
1970s 952,841 current US$ per square kilometre 1.38 million current US$ per square kilometre 422,644 current US$ per square kilometre Germany
1980s 1.97 million current US$ per square kilometre 2.92 million current US$ per square kilometre 949,800 current US$ per square kilometre Germany
1990s 4.01 million current US$ per square kilometre 6.29 million current US$ per square kilometre 2.28 million current US$ per square kilometre Germany
2000s 6.15 million current US$ per square kilometre 8.00 million current US$ per square kilometre 1.85 million current US$ per square kilometre Germany
2010s 8.67 million current US$ per square kilometre 11.09 million current US$ per square kilometre 2.42 million current US$ per square kilometre Germany
2020s 10.18 million current US$ per square kilometre 12.62 million current US$ per square kilometre 2.44 million current US$ per square kilometre Germany

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gni, atlas method (current us$), per square kilometre, Denmark or Germany?
Germany, at 13.21 million current US$ per square kilometre against 10.72 million current US$ per square kilometre in Denmark as of 2023.
What is the difference in gni, atlas method (current us$), per square kilometre between Denmark and Germany?
2.49 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Germany ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Germany?
62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
How do Denmark and Germany rank globally for gni, atlas method (current us$), per square kilometre?
Denmark ranks 27th and Germany ranks 24th of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs Germany: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-atlas-method-current-us-per-square-kilometre/denmark/germany/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-atlas-method-current-us-per-square-kilometre/denmark/germany/">Denmark vs Germany: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
252 places, 12,469 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

GNI, Atlas method (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.