Central Europe and the Baltics vs Singapore: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre

Central Europe and the Baltics
1.86 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Singapore
573.03 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Central Europe and the Baltics rank
2nd
Singapore rank
2nd

GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Central Europe and the Baltics
  • Singapore
0200.0M400.0M600.0M196219922023

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 573.03 million current US$ per square kilometre against 1.86 million current US$ per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 571.16 million current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Singapore's figure about 307.8 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.

Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 2nd and Singapore ranks 2nd of 45 groups.

Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central Europe and the Baltics Singapore Difference Ahead
1990s 317,565 current US$ per square kilometre 120.97 million current US$ per square kilometre 120.65 million current US$ per square kilometre Singapore
2000s 721,544 current US$ per square kilometre 185.97 million current US$ per square kilometre 185.25 million current US$ per square kilometre Singapore
2010s 1.27 million current US$ per square kilometre 410.73 million current US$ per square kilometre 409.45 million current US$ per square kilometre Singapore
2020s 1.69 million current US$ per square kilometre 512.81 million current US$ per square kilometre 511.13 million current US$ per square kilometre Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gni, atlas method (current us$), per square kilometre, Central Europe and the Baltics or Singapore?
Singapore, at 573.03 million current US$ per square kilometre against 1.86 million current US$ per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2023.
What is the difference in gni, atlas method (current us$), per square kilometre between Central Europe and the Baltics and Singapore?
571.16 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Europe and the Baltics and Singapore?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Central Europe and the Baltics and Singapore rank globally for gni, atlas method (current us$), per square kilometre?
Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 2nd and Singapore ranks 2nd of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Europe and the Baltics vs Singapore: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-atlas-method-current-us-per-square-kilometre/central-europe-and-the-baltics/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-atlas-method-current-us-per-square-kilometre/central-europe-and-the-baltics/singapore/">Central Europe and the Baltics vs Singapore: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
252 places, 12,469 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

GNI, Atlas method (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.