Bermuda vs Hong Kong, China: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre

Bermuda
159.90 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Hong Kong, China
393.83 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bermuda rank
4th
Hong Kong, China rank
3rd

GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Bermuda
  • Hong Kong, China
0100.0M200.0M300.0M400.0M196319932023

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 393.83 million current US$ per square kilometre against 159.90 million current US$ per square kilometre in Bermuda, a difference of 233.93 million current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 2.5 times Bermuda's.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.

Bermuda ranks 4th and Hong Kong, China ranks 3rd of 205 countries.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bermuda Hong Kong, China Difference Ahead
2010s 126.63 million current US$ per square kilometre 288.25 million current US$ per square kilometre 161.62 million current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
2020s 148.51 million current US$ per square kilometre 375.36 million current US$ per square kilometre 226.85 million current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gni, atlas method (current us$), per square kilometre, Bermuda or Hong Kong, China?
Hong Kong, China, at 393.83 million current US$ per square kilometre against 159.90 million current US$ per square kilometre in Bermuda as of 2023.
What is the difference in gni, atlas method (current us$), per square kilometre between Bermuda and Hong Kong, China?
233.93 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bermuda and Hong Kong, China?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Bermuda and Hong Kong, China rank globally for gni, atlas method (current us$), per square kilometre?
Bermuda ranks 4th and Hong Kong, China ranks 3rd of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bermuda vs Hong Kong, China: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-atlas-method-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bermuda/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-atlas-method-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bermuda/hong-kong-sar-china/">Bermuda vs Hong Kong, China: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
252 places, 12,469 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

GNI, Atlas method (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.