Barbados vs Japan: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre

Barbados
16.22 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Japan
13.91 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados rank
20th
Japan rank
21st

GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Barbados
  • Japan
05.0M10.0M15.0M20.0M196219922023

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 16.22 million current US$ per square kilometre against 13.91 million current US$ per square kilometre in Japan, a difference of 2.31 million current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Barbados's figure about 1.2 times Japan's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Barbados ahead.

Barbados ranks 20th and Japan ranks 21st of 205 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 1 and Japan in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Japan Difference Ahead
1960s 353,020 current US$ per square kilometre 308,354 current US$ per square kilometre 44,665 current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
1970s 1.04 million current US$ per square kilometre 1.53 million current US$ per square kilometre 485,648 current US$ per square kilometre Japan
1980s 3.26 million current US$ per square kilometre 5.10 million current US$ per square kilometre 1.84 million current US$ per square kilometre Japan
1990s 5.17 million current US$ per square kilometre 12.50 million current US$ per square kilometre 7.33 million current US$ per square kilometre Japan
2000s 8.40 million current US$ per square kilometre 13.61 million current US$ per square kilometre 5.21 million current US$ per square kilometre Japan
2010s 12.35 million current US$ per square kilometre 15.43 million current US$ per square kilometre 3.08 million current US$ per square kilometre Japan
2020s 14.51 million current US$ per square kilometre 14.80 million current US$ per square kilometre 290,650 current US$ per square kilometre Japan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gni, atlas method (current us$), per square kilometre, Barbados or Japan?
Barbados, at 16.22 million current US$ per square kilometre against 13.91 million current US$ per square kilometre in Japan as of 2023.
What is the difference in gni, atlas method (current us$), per square kilometre between Barbados and Japan?
2.31 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Japan?
62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
How do Barbados and Japan rank globally for gni, atlas method (current us$), per square kilometre?
Barbados ranks 20th and Japan ranks 21st of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Japan: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-atlas-method-current-us-per-square-kilometre/barbados/japan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-atlas-method-current-us-per-square-kilometre/barbados/japan/">Barbados vs Japan: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
252 places, 12,469 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

GNI, Atlas method (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.