Barbados vs IBRD only: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre

Barbados
16.22 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
IBRD only
556,950 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados rank
20th
IBRD only rank
17th

GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Barbados
  • IBRD only
05.0M10.0M15.0M196219922023

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 16.22 million current US$ per square kilometre against 556,950 current US$ per square kilometre in IBRD only, a difference of 15.67 million current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Barbados's figure about 29.1 times IBRD only's.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Barbados has been ahead every year.

Barbados ranks 20th and IBRD only ranks 17th of 205 countries.

Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados IBRD only Difference Ahead
1960s 353,020 current US$ per square kilometre 8,160 current US$ per square kilometre 344,860 current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
1970s 1.04 million current US$ per square kilometre 23,399 current US$ per square kilometre 1.02 million current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
1980s 3.26 million current US$ per square kilometre 53,378 current US$ per square kilometre 3.20 million current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
1990s 5.17 million current US$ per square kilometre 67,692 current US$ per square kilometre 5.10 million current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
2000s 8.40 million current US$ per square kilometre 135,771 current US$ per square kilometre 8.26 million current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
2010s 12.35 million current US$ per square kilometre 367,580 current US$ per square kilometre 11.99 million current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
2020s 14.51 million current US$ per square kilometre 500,168 current US$ per square kilometre 14.01 million current US$ per square kilometre Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gni, atlas method (current us$), per square kilometre, Barbados or IBRD only?
Barbados, at 16.22 million current US$ per square kilometre against 556,950 current US$ per square kilometre in IBRD only as of 2023.
What is the difference in gni, atlas method (current us$), per square kilometre between Barbados and IBRD only?
15.67 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and IBRD only?
62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
How do Barbados and IBRD only rank globally for gni, atlas method (current us$), per square kilometre?
Barbados ranks 20th and IBRD only ranks 17th of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs IBRD only: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-atlas-method-current-us-per-square-kilometre/barbados/ibrd-only/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-atlas-method-current-us-per-square-kilometre/barbados/ibrd-only/">Barbados vs IBRD only: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
252 places, 12,469 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

GNI, Atlas method (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.