Bahamas vs El Salvador: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre

Bahamas
1.40 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
El Salvador
1.50 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bahamas rank
72nd
El Salvador rank
69th

GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Bahamas
  • El Salvador
0500.0k1.0M1.5M196219922023

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 1.50 million current US$ per square kilometre against 1.40 million current US$ per square kilometre in Bahamas, a difference of 97,380 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.1 times Bahamas's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1967 it was El Salvador ahead.

Bahamas ranks 72nd and El Salvador ranks 69th of 205 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 4 and El Salvador in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas El Salvador Difference Ahead
1960s 40,103 current US$ per square kilometre 50,118 current US$ per square kilometre 10,015 current US$ per square kilometre El Salvador
1970s 69,594 current US$ per square kilometre 98,841 current US$ per square kilometre 29,247 current US$ per square kilometre El Salvador
1980s 200,666 current US$ per square kilometre 180,496 current US$ per square kilometre 20,169 current US$ per square kilometre Bahamas
1990s 402,197 current US$ per square kilometre 371,424 current US$ per square kilometre 30,774 current US$ per square kilometre Bahamas
2000s 934,238 current US$ per square kilometre 688,510 current US$ per square kilometre 245,729 current US$ per square kilometre Bahamas
2010s 1.09 million current US$ per square kilometre 1.05 million current US$ per square kilometre 40,294 current US$ per square kilometre Bahamas
2020s 1.23 million current US$ per square kilometre 1.35 million current US$ per square kilometre 116,948 current US$ per square kilometre El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gni, atlas method (current us$), per square kilometre, Bahamas or El Salvador?
El Salvador, at 1.50 million current US$ per square kilometre against 1.40 million current US$ per square kilometre in Bahamas as of 2023.
What is the difference in gni, atlas method (current us$), per square kilometre between Bahamas and El Salvador?
97,380 current US$ per square kilometre, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and El Salvador?
57 years are reported by both, from 1967 to 2023.
How do Bahamas and El Salvador rank globally for gni, atlas method (current us$), per square kilometre?
Bahamas ranks 72nd and El Salvador ranks 69th of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs El Salvador: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-atlas-method-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bahamas-the/el-salvador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-atlas-method-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bahamas-the/el-salvador/">Bahamas vs El Salvador: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
252 places, 12,469 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

GNI, Atlas method (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.