Antigua and Barbuda vs Ireland: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre

Antigua and Barbuda
4.29 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ireland
6.11 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Antigua and Barbuda rank
38th
Ireland rank
35th

GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Ireland
02.0M4.0M6.0M196219922023

How they compare

Ireland currently reports 6.11 million current US$ per square kilometre against 4.29 million current US$ per square kilometre in Antigua and Barbuda, a difference of 1.82 million current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Ireland's figure about 1.4 times Antigua and Barbuda's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1979 it was Ireland ahead.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 38th and Ireland ranks 35th of 205 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Antigua and Barbuda averaged higher in 3 and Ireland in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda Ireland Difference Ahead
1970s 245,761 current US$ per square kilometre 250,588 current US$ per square kilometre 4,827 current US$ per square kilometre Ireland
1980s 544,573 current US$ per square kilometre 369,603 current US$ per square kilometre 174,970 current US$ per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
1990s 1.37 million current US$ per square kilometre 900,104 current US$ per square kilometre 473,513 current US$ per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2000s 2.50 million current US$ per square kilometre 2.34 million current US$ per square kilometre 159,963 current US$ per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2010s 3.10 million current US$ per square kilometre 3.45 million current US$ per square kilometre 345,869 current US$ per square kilometre Ireland
2020s 3.74 million current US$ per square kilometre 5.52 million current US$ per square kilometre 1.77 million current US$ per square kilometre Ireland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gni, atlas method (current us$), per square kilometre, Antigua and Barbuda or Ireland?
Ireland, at 6.11 million current US$ per square kilometre against 4.29 million current US$ per square kilometre in Antigua and Barbuda as of 2023.
What is the difference in gni, atlas method (current us$), per square kilometre between Antigua and Barbuda and Ireland?
1.82 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Ireland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Ireland?
45 years are reported by both, from 1979 to 2023.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Ireland rank globally for gni, atlas method (current us$), per square kilometre?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 38th and Ireland ranks 35th of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs Ireland: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-atlas-method-current-us-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/ireland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-atlas-method-current-us-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/ireland/">Antigua and Barbuda vs Ireland: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
252 places, 12,469 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

GNI, Atlas method (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.