East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Sweden: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per capita

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
11,093 current US$ per person
in 2025
Sweden
63,009 current US$ per person
in 2025
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank
15th
Sweden rank
18th

GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per capita over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
  • Sweden
020.0k40.0k60.0k196219932025

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 63,009 current US$ per person against 11,093 current US$ per person in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 51,916 current US$ per person.

That makes Sweden's figure about 5.7 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.

Across all 64 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 15th and Sweden ranks 18th of 45 groups.

Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) Sweden Difference Ahead
1960s 93.88 current US$ per person 3,266 current US$ per person 3,172 current US$ per person Sweden
1970s 189.87 current US$ per person 9,042 current US$ per person 8,852 current US$ per person Sweden
1980s 346.99 current US$ per person 17,519 current US$ per person 17,172 current US$ per person Sweden
1990s 666.04 current US$ per person 29,642 current US$ per person 28,976 current US$ per person Sweden
2000s 1,751 current US$ per person 41,753 current US$ per person 40,001 current US$ per person Sweden
2010s 6,185 current US$ per person 56,756 current US$ per person 50,572 current US$ per person Sweden
2020s 10,097 current US$ per person 59,737 current US$ per person 49,641 current US$ per person Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gni, atlas method (current us$), per capita, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or Sweden?
Sweden, at 63,009 current US$ per person against 11,093 current US$ per person in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2025.
What is the difference in gni, atlas method (current us$), per capita between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Sweden?
51,916 current US$ per person, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Sweden?
64 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2025.
How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Sweden rank globally for gni, atlas method (current us$), per capita?
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 15th and Sweden ranks 18th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Sweden: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-atlas-method-current-us-per-capita/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-atlas-method-current-us-per-capita/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/sweden/">East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Sweden: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
254 places, 13,209 data points, 1962–2025
Last refreshed

GNI, Atlas method (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.