Belarus vs Cuba: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per capita
Belarus
9,165 current US$ per person
in 2025
Cuba
9,010 current US$ per person
in 2019
Belarus rank
99th
Cuba rank
101st
GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per capita over time
- Belarus
- Cuba
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 9,165 current US$ per person against 9,010 current US$ per person in Cuba, a difference of 155 current US$ per person.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Cuba ahead.
Belarus ranks 99th and Cuba ranks 101st of 207 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Cuba | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,503 current US$ per person | 2,311 current US$ per person | 808.27 current US$ per person | Cuba |
| 2000s | 2,963 current US$ per person | 3,801 current US$ per person | 838.04 current US$ per person | Cuba |
| 2010s | 6,358 current US$ per person | 7,086 current US$ per person | 727.5 current US$ per person | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gni, atlas method (current us$), per capita, Belarus or Cuba?
- Belarus, at 9,165 current US$ per person against 9,010 current US$ per person in Cuba as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gni, atlas method (current us$), per capita between Belarus and Cuba?
- 155 current US$ per person, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Cuba?
- 28 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Cuba rank globally for gni, atlas method (current us$), per capita?
- Belarus ranks 99th and Cuba ranks 101st of 207 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
GNI, Atlas method (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.