North Macedonia vs Sao Tome and Principe: General government final consumption expenditure (current US$), per

North Macedonia
93,888 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
81,031 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
North Macedonia rank
90th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
93rd

General government final consumption expenditure (current US$), per over time

  • North Macedonia
  • Sao Tome and Principe
20.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k199220072023

How they compare

North Macedonia currently reports 93,888 current US$ per square kilometre against 81,031 current US$ per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 12,857 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes North Macedonia's figure about 1.2 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

Across all 16 years both countries report, North Macedonia has been ahead every year.

North Macedonia ranks 90th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 93rd of 184 countries.

North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade North Macedonia Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
2000s 72,051 current US$ per square kilometre 52,378 current US$ per square kilometre 19,673 current US$ per square kilometre North Macedonia
2010s 70,960 current US$ per square kilometre 56,230 current US$ per square kilometre 14,730 current US$ per square kilometre North Macedonia
2020s 86,699 current US$ per square kilometre 75,847 current US$ per square kilometre 10,852 current US$ per square kilometre North Macedonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher general government final consumption expenditure (current us$), per, North Macedonia or Sao Tome and Principe?
North Macedonia, at 93,888 current US$ per square kilometre against 81,031 current US$ per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2023.
What is the difference in general government final consumption expenditure (current us$), per between North Macedonia and Sao Tome and Principe?
12,857 current US$ per square kilometre, with North Macedonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Sao Tome and Principe?
16 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2023.
How do North Macedonia and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for general government final consumption expenditure (current us$), per?
North Macedonia ranks 90th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 93rd of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as General government final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

North Macedonia vs Sao Tome and Principe: General government final consumption expenditure (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/north-macedonia/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/north-macedonia/sao-tome-and-principe/">North Macedonia vs Sao Tome and Principe: General government final consumption expenditure (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
General government final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 10,408 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

General government final consumption expenditure (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.