Mali vs Niger: General government final consumption expenditure (current US$), per

Mali
2,614 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Niger
1,657 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mali rank
175th
Niger rank
178th

General government final consumption expenditure (current US$), per over time

  • Mali
  • Niger
01.0k2.0k3.0k196119922023

How they compare

Mali currently reports 2,614 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,657 current US$ per square kilometre in Niger, a difference of 957 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Mali's figure about 1.6 times Niger's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1967 it was Niger ahead.

Mali ranks 175th and Niger ranks 178th of 184 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Mali averaged higher in 4 and Niger in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mali Niger Difference Ahead
1960s 31.1 current US$ per square kilometre 42.75 current US$ per square kilometre 11.65 current US$ per square kilometre Niger
1970s 73.6 current US$ per square kilometre 97.19 current US$ per square kilometre 23.59 current US$ per square kilometre Niger
1980s 313.62 current US$ per square kilometre 189.1 current US$ per square kilometre 124.52 current US$ per square kilometre Mali
1990s 298.33 current US$ per square kilometre 439.19 current US$ per square kilometre 140.86 current US$ per square kilometre Niger
2000s 813.17 current US$ per square kilometre 629.96 current US$ per square kilometre 183.21 current US$ per square kilometre Mali
2010s 1,904 current US$ per square kilometre 1,249 current US$ per square kilometre 654.66 current US$ per square kilometre Mali
2020s 2,346 current US$ per square kilometre 1,704 current US$ per square kilometre 641.86 current US$ per square kilometre Mali

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher general government final consumption expenditure (current us$), per, Mali or Niger?
Mali, at 2,614 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,657 current US$ per square kilometre in Niger as of 2023.
What is the difference in general government final consumption expenditure (current us$), per between Mali and Niger?
957 current US$ per square kilometre, with Mali ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Niger?
57 years are reported by both, from 1967 to 2023.
How do Mali and Niger rank globally for general government final consumption expenditure (current us$), per?
Mali ranks 175th and Niger ranks 178th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as General government final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mali vs Niger: General government final consumption expenditure (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mali/niger/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mali/niger/">Mali vs Niger: General government final consumption expenditure (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
General government final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 10,408 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

General government final consumption expenditure (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.