Congo vs Tanzania, United Republic of: General government final consumption expenditure (current US$), per

Congo
5,877 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of
7,815 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
162nd
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
160th

General government final consumption expenditure (current US$), per over time

  • Congo
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k196119922023

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 7,815 current US$ per square kilometre against 5,877 current US$ per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 1,938 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Tanzania, United Republic of's figure about 1.3 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 162nd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 160th of 184 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 3 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1990s 1,521 current US$ per square kilometre 925.16 current US$ per square kilometre 595.64 current US$ per square kilometre Congo
2000s 2,543 current US$ per square kilometre 2,364 current US$ per square kilometre 178.79 current US$ per square kilometre Congo
2010s 6,464 current US$ per square kilometre 4,906 current US$ per square kilometre 1,559 current US$ per square kilometre Congo
2020s 5,921 current US$ per square kilometre 6,761 current US$ per square kilometre 839.44 current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher general government final consumption expenditure (current us$), per, Congo or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 7,815 current US$ per square kilometre against 5,877 current US$ per square kilometre in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in general government final consumption expenditure (current us$), per between Congo and Tanzania, United Republic of?
1,938 current US$ per square kilometre, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Tanzania, United Republic of?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Congo and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for general government final consumption expenditure (current us$), per?
Congo ranks 162nd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 160th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as General government final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Tanzania, United Republic of: General government final consumption expenditure (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/tanzania/">Congo vs Tanzania, United Republic of: General government final consumption expenditure (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
General government final consumption expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 10,408 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

General government final consumption expenditure (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.