Guatemala vs Zimbabwe: General government final consumption expenditure

Guatemala
108.50 billion current LCU
in 2025
Zimbabwe
100.00 billion current LCU
in 2024
Guatemala rank
105th
Zimbabwe rank
108th

General government final consumption expenditure over time

  • Guatemala
  • Zimbabwe
025.0B50.0B75.0B100.0B196019922025

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 108.50 billion current LCU against 100.00 billion current LCU in Zimbabwe, a difference of 8.50 billion current LCU.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 65 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Guatemala ahead.

Guatemala ranks 105th and Zimbabwe ranks 108th of 186 countries.

Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 97.85 million current LCU 60,310 current LCU 97.79 million current LCU Guatemala
1970s 264.53 million current LCU 203,093 current LCU 264.33 million current LCU Guatemala
1980s 1.02 billion current LCU 577,568 current LCU 1.02 billion current LCU Guatemala
1990s 4.71 billion current LCU 528,889 current LCU 4.71 billion current LCU Guatemala
2000s 19.19 billion current LCU 343,110 current LCU 19.19 billion current LCU Guatemala
2010s 49.90 billion current LCU 2.12 million current LCU 49.90 billion current LCU Guatemala
2020s 83.31 billion current LCU 21.83 billion current LCU 61.48 billion current LCU Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher general government final consumption expenditure, Guatemala or Zimbabwe?
Guatemala, at 108.50 billion current LCU against 100.00 billion current LCU in Zimbabwe as of 2025.
What is the difference in general government final consumption expenditure between Guatemala and Zimbabwe?
8.50 billion current LCU, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Zimbabwe?
65 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2024.
How do Guatemala and Zimbabwe rank globally for general government final consumption expenditure?
Guatemala ranks 105th and Zimbabwe ranks 108th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Zimbabwe: General government final consumption expenditure. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu/guatemala/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu/guatemala/zimbabwe/">Guatemala vs Zimbabwe: General government final consumption expenditure</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU)
Unit
current LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
186 places, 8,735 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure is expenditure on goods and services by resident institutional units for the direct satisfaction of human needs or wants, whether individual or collective. General government FCE includes all government current expenditures for purchases of goods and services (including compensation of employees), and most expenditures on national defense and security, but excludes government military expenditures that are part of government capital formation. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.