Burkina Faso vs Chile: General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per

Burkina Faso
103.62 current LCU per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Chile
143.23 current LCU per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Burkina Faso rank
27th
Chile rank
26th

General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Chile
050100150196019922025

How they compare

Chile currently reports 143.23 current LCU per US$ of GDP against 103.62 current LCU per US$ of GDP in Burkina Faso, a difference of 39.61 current LCU per US$ of GDP.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.4 times Burkina Faso's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 66 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Burkina Faso ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 27th and Chile ranks 26th of 187 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 6 and Chile in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Chile Difference Ahead
1960s 15.53 current LCU per US$ of GDP 0.0004 current LCU per US$ of GDP 15.53 current LCU per US$ of GDP Burkina Faso
1970s 21.72 current LCU per US$ of GDP 1.54 current LCU per US$ of GDP 20.18 current LCU per US$ of GDP Burkina Faso
1980s 52.9 current LCU per US$ of GDP 16.3 current LCU per US$ of GDP 36.6 current LCU per US$ of GDP Burkina Faso
1990s 97.6 current LCU per US$ of GDP 43.11 current LCU per US$ of GDP 54.49 current LCU per US$ of GDP Burkina Faso
2000s 83.09 current LCU per US$ of GDP 69.17 current LCU per US$ of GDP 13.92 current LCU per US$ of GDP Burkina Faso
2010s 87.79 current LCU per US$ of GDP 80.56 current LCU per US$ of GDP 7.23 current LCU per US$ of GDP Burkina Faso
2020s 117.52 current LCU per US$ of GDP 130.27 current LCU per US$ of GDP 12.75 current LCU per US$ of GDP Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher general government final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per, Burkina Faso or Chile?
Chile, at 143.23 current LCU per US$ of GDP against 103.62 current LCU per US$ of GDP in Burkina Faso as of 2025.
What is the difference in general government final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per between Burkina Faso and Chile?
39.61 current LCU per US$ of GDP, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Chile?
66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do Burkina Faso and Chile rank globally for general government final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per?
Burkina Faso ranks 27th and Chile ranks 26th of 187 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Chile: General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-unit-of-gdp/burkina-faso/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-unit-of-gdp/burkina-faso/chile/">Burkina Faso vs Chile: General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per unit of GDP
Unit
current LCU per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
187 places, 8,721 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.